Comparison 03 · Audit sample

Robot 3D LiDAR evidence table

Panoramic LiDAR specifications with reflectivity, return mode and configuration attached.

9 component records6 comparison fieldsUpdated 2026-08-10
Scope

Compact and long-range Livox, configurable Ouster and 32-channel Hesai sensors used in robotic perception stacks.

Do not flatten

A single “range” number is misleading unless reflectivity, ambient light, channel and detection criterion match.

FieldLivox
MID-360
Ouster
OS1
Hesai Technology
XT32
Livox
Avia
Ouster
OS0
Livox
Mid-70
Ouster
OS2
Hesai Technology
QT128
SICK
MULS1AA-112211 multiScan136
Range claimReflectivity and instrument-range distinctions remain visible.40 m @ 10%; 70 m @ 80%MTarget reflectivity; 100 klx ambient illumination.Source ↗90 mMManufacturer overview labels this as range at a 10% target.Source ↗0.05–120 mMManufacturer product-table range; not the same as a target-qualified detection distance.Source ↗190 m @ 10%; 230 m @ 20%; 320 m @ 80%MTarget reflectivity under 100 klx ambient illumination.Source ↗35 mMManufacturer overview labels this as range at a 10% target.Source ↗90 m @ 10%; 130 m @ 20%; 260 m @ 80%MTarget reflectivity under 100 klx ambient illumination.Source ↗200 mMRev7 OS2 headline range at a 10% target.Source ↗0.05–50 mMInstrumented range; detection range is reflectivity- and channel-dependent.Source ↗10 m @ 10% / 100 klx; 12 m @ 10% / 10 klx; 15 m @ 90% / 100 klx; 30 m @ 90% / 10 klxMDetection probability greater than 99%; reflectivity and ambient-light conditions preserved.Source ↗
Point rateReturn mode and family configuration matter.200,000 points/sMFirst return.Source ↗10,485,760 points/sMMaximum published Rev8 family configuration; operating mode and channel option must be fixed.Source ↗640,000 points/sMSingle return; dual-return rate differs.Source ↗240,000 first/strongest; 480,000 dual; 720,000 triple points/sMReturn mode changes rate.Source ↗10,485,760 points/sMMaximum published Rev8 family configuration.Source ↗100,000 single; 200,000 dual points/sMReturn mode changes rate.Source ↗2.62 million points/sMHighest listed family configuration.Source ↗1,152,000 points/sCCurrent product page value; Q03 manual dated 2026-04-10 lists 864,000 points/s.Source ↗216,000–648,000 points/sMDepends on number of evaluated echoes.Source ↗
Field of viewHorizontal and vertical axes are not collapsed.360 × 59 °MHorizontal 360°; vertical −7° to +52°.Source ↗45 °MHorizontal coverage is panoramic for the spinning sensor.Source ↗360 × 31 °MHorizontal × vertical.Source ↗70.4 × 77.2 non-repetitive / 70.4 × 4.5 repetitive °MHorizontal × vertical.Source ↗90 °MHorizontal coverage is panoramic for the spinning sensor.Source ↗70.4 circular °MCircular FOV.Source ↗22.5 °MHorizontal coverage is panoramic in the spinning configuration.Source ↗360 × 105.2 °MHorizontal × vertical.Source ↗360 × 65 °MHorizontal × vertical; vertical span 22.5° to −42.5°.Source ↗
ChannelsNot every scanning architecture uses channels the same way.UnknownNo adequate published value in the selected source set.128 channelsMOS1 Rev8 family maximum; OS1 Max is a separate product boundary.Source ↗32MNo extra condition in selected source.Source ↗UnknownNo adequate published value in the selected source set.128 channelsMFamily maximum; ordered channel and beam configuration matter.Source ↗UnknownNo adequate published value in the selected source set.128MOS2 family option.Source ↗128MNo extra condition in selected source.Source ↗16MTwo 0.125° high-resolution layers and fourteen wider-resolution layers in this configuration.Source ↗
PowerUnknown is shown when the selected citation does not support the field.6.5 WMManufacturer average.Source ↗10–20 WMCurrent family-level range; cold-start and system supply margin are separate.Source ↗UnknownNo adequate published value in the selected source set.8 non-repetitive / 9 repetitive; 16 startup WMStartup power may increase at low temperature.Source ↗10–20 WMCurrent family-level range; cold-start peak is separate.Source ↗8 WMManufacturer average-power value.Source ↗Not published in cited specificationURCI checked the cited official specification on the verification date.Source ↗12 WMManufacturer typical/nominal specification in the cited technical material.Source ↗UnknownNo adequate published value in the selected source set.
SynchronizationProtocol support is only one layer of timing performance.IEEE 1588-2008 PTPv2 / GPSMNo extra condition in selected source.Source ↗UnknownNo adequate published value in the selected source set.GPS / PTPMThe user manual lists ≤1 μs PTP clock accuracy under its stated conditions.Source ↗IEEE 1588-2008 PTPv2, PPS, GPSMNo extra condition in selected source.Source ↗UnknownNo adequate published value in the selected source set.IEEE 1588-2008 PTPv2, PPS and GPSMNo extra condition in selected source.Source ↗UnknownNo adequate published value in the selected source set.PTPMProtocol support; achieved timing depends on the system clock path.Source ↗PTPMFeature list for this ordering code; achieved synchronization still requires system validation.Source ↗

Values are transcribed from the linked sources and were checked on the date shown by each record. V = independently verified; M = manufacturer claimed; D = RCI derived; C = conflicting; U = unknown.

Read the conditioned-range audit

The comparison table keeps each selected source value intact. RCI 014 goes one level deeper: it separates target reflectivity, ambient light, detection criteria and representable-range boundaries across nine revision-bounded sensors and 21 observations. Open the 3D LiDAR range audit →

Interpretation rule

The condition belongs to the number.

RCI does not compute winners from this audit sample. The table’s purpose is to show what can be compared now, what requires a shared test, and which public fields are still missing.

Read the full method →